Would something like a .railwayignore file work?

Would something like a .railwayignore file work?

Jake Runzer: Sure !

Great request but unsure what this looks like JUST yet (.railwayignore might be it but feels odd)
There's a lot of neat stuff we can build on

Jake Cooper: Something like a Procfile where we can configure (future) options ? and then a key for ignoring files/folders/glob pattern ?

My use-case: I've have a Dockerfile at the root of my repo but I still don't want railway to use docker for deployment. How can I opt out of it?

ref: https://vercel.com/docs/concepts/projects/overview#ignored-build-step

rignt now, all of my prs lead to builds regardless of code change since it is in a monorepo

My use-case: I've have a Dockerfile at the root of my repo but I still don't want railway to use docker for deployment. How can I opt out of it?

Yashu Mittal: Simply renaming it to dev.Dockerfile. Not optimal. We might wanna let you define in the UI

Would something like a .railwayignore file work?

Jake Runzer: Not in the case of a monorepo since we need a .railwayignore per service

I have a similar need but for monorepos. I have 7 apps in it and if I make a change on one, all the 7 apps are build.
Now, monorepos are extra tricky because a change on an app may require a build in another app due to their dependencies