Feature Request: Usage-based billing without plan minimum
itsyegor
HOBBYOP

a month ago

Description:

Hobby ($5) and Pro ($20) both require a fixed monthly minimum regardless of actual usage. For lightweight workloads – small bots, personal scripts – this means paying way more than what's consumed. This comes up regularly in community threads and reviews.

My own case: a personal Telegram bot that turns photos/PDFs/text of tickets and bookings into calendar events via Claude. Actual usage is about $0.86/month, but I'm on Hobby paying $5 – the Free tier doesn't work here since it requires serverless-only deployments, and this bot needs to stay running continuously to receive messages.

With vibe-coding growing, more non-technical people are deploying tiny always-on tools like this – costing under $1/month in real usage, but needing a $5+ plan just to stay online.

Proposed Solution

A pure top-up/credit model like Anthropic's Claude API – add funds, pay only for actual usage, no subscription floor. Keep Hobby/Pro as options for those who prefer flat pricing.

Under Review

0 Threads mention this feature

0 Replies

Welcome!

Sign in to your Railway account to join the conversation.

Loading...