2 years ago
I went to try the metal east region today but it seemed to ignore my config-as-code and forced things onto nixpacks instead of my dockerfiles. Is that expected?
46 Replies
2 years ago
41f3e5b0-3233-406e-938c-ed0cbe426163
2 years ago
I reverted back to non-metal and things re-deployed properly
2 years ago
service id please
2 years ago
where do I find that?
2 years ago
or is it just the name?
2 years ago
in the url
2 years ago
16dac37f-5029-40d0-9aa2-343a1d24c3fb looks like?
2 years ago
you tell me, is that the service you are having trouble with?
2 years ago
it is a part of the url of one of the 4 services that had the issue; just not sure it is the right url piece
2 years ago
it was the bit after service/
2 years ago
its not on metal?
2 years ago
not any longer
2 years ago
reverted so it worked again
2 years ago
fair enough
2 years ago
22141b7a-9c6e-4bc9-8dd1-d110e34d4ec3 was a build for that service that was attempted on metal
2 years ago
can we revert back to metal?
2 years ago
i can revert a different service. sec
2 years ago
service: ad2c318e-3979-430b-a21b-8d7e3f15eab0
2 years ago
it used a dockerfile
2 years ago
hrm
2 years ago
ill tell you if its really on metal once it deploys
2 years ago
yes it is
2 years ago
build 5cf3a139-57a3-45a5-a839-45ab51ac3f04 of that service was the original failure that tried to use nixpacks somehow
2 years ago
wanna put the other service on metal now?
2 years ago
sure, can try the others to see if they start working
2 years ago
lets see what happens
2 years ago
it also used a dockerfile
2 years ago
yeah
2 years ago
also getting a weird error about port binding that I have to track down though. it is going to fail
2 years ago
so problem fixed?
2 years ago
well i haven't gotten a clean metal deploy for the one and still no explanation of why I got random nixpack builds in the middle, so probably will go back to non-metal for now for stability
2 years ago
alrightly, let me know if this happens again!
2 years ago
ah, figured out my port issue. occasionally, the random railway PORT would be 8080, which is what my service behind the proxy binds to. other times it was 8081 or something else and everything was hunky-dory
2 years ago
i dont see anywhere in our code that would set it to 8181, its hardcoded to 8080
2 years ago
hm. pretty sure PORT used to be if not randomized, at least not static and we could force-set it
2 years ago
anyhow, forcing it to 8081 fixed that for me
2 years ago
yes it was random on the legacy runtime
2 years ago
any idea when it might be possible to move databases to metal btw? with things in non-metal US West, i get api response times of ~110ms; swapping the service to metal west approx doubles it; swapping to metal east ~doubles again (understandably).
2 years ago
I suspect it is database latency, but haven't dug a lot into my tracing yet
2 years ago
are you connecting to the database over the private network?
2 years ago
should be
2 years ago
do you have tracing?
2 years ago
trying to see if it recorded any of them (it is heavily sampled for cost)
2 years ago
but to answer the question, i dont have an exact timeline, but our hardware for storage is in shipping
2 years ago
ok, thanks. I'll keep an eye if I can get a good trace too. Calling it a night for now
2 years ago
sounds good!