4 months ago
I have the following configuration. What's wrong?
{
"$schema": "https://schema.railpack.com/",
"secrets": [
"BETTER_AUTH_SECRET",
"BETTER_AUTH_URL",
"CORS_ORIGIN",
"DATABASE_URL",
"DISCORD_CLIENT_ID",
"DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET",
"GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID",
"GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET",
"TWITCH_CLIENT_ID",
"TWITCH_CLIENT_SECRET"
],
"steps": {
"install": {
"commands": ["bun install"],
"variables": {
"NODE_ENV": "production"
}
},
"build": {
"inputs": [{ "step": "install" }],
"secrets": ["BETTER_AUTH_URL", "CORS_ORIGIN", "DATABASE_URL"],
"commands": ["bun run db:generate && bun run --filter web build"]
},
"predeploy": {
"inputs": [{ "step": "build" }],
"commands": ["bun run db:migrate"]
}
},
"deploy": {
"startCommand": "bun run --filter web start",
"variables": {
"NODE_ENV": "production"
}
}
}I somehow got it working using some configs in the Settings tab but I'm wondering if it's possible to make this work only using a railpack config.
75 Replies
I somehow got it working using some configs in the Settings tab but I'm wondering if it's possible to make this work only using a railpack config.
the problem is, that I need to run the generate in the root directory bc of prisma
4 months ago
Can you try this in your build step? local
"build": {
"inputs": [
{
"step": "install"
},
{
"local": true
}
],
"commands": [
"bun run db:generate && bun run --filter web build"
]
}
}4 months ago
Also on install,
"install": {
"inputs": [
{
"local": true,
"include": [
"package.json",
"bun.lockb",
"bun.lock"
]
}
],
"commands": [
"bun install"
]
}
4 months ago
Try that
4 months ago
sorry (put yoour desired bun version)
"install": {
"inputs": [
{
"image": "oven/bun:latest"
},
{
"local": true,
"include": [
"package.json",
"bun.lockb",
"bun.lock"
]
}
],
"commands": [
"bun install"
]
}4 months ago
I also missed this, "local": {} instead of true
at least the docker image pulled. idk. it feels like the code is just straight up missing or sth
4 months ago
Hmm
and the other thing to keep in mind that it somehow worked with this config
but I normally don't deploy on railpack directly thus this isn't a sutable option for me
4 months ago
You can generate a railpack from that service (with that config)
4 months ago
Click the service, and the latest deployment (with your desired config) then click Details.
{
"$schema": "https://railway.com/railway.schema.json",
"build": {
"builder": "RAILPACK",
"buildCommand": "bun run db:generate && bun run --filter web build"
},
"deploy": {
"runtime": "V2",
"numReplicas": 1,
"startCommand": "bun run --filter web start",
"preDeployCommand": [
"bun run db:migrate"
],
"sleepApplication": false,
"useLegacyStacker": false,
"multiRegionConfig": {
"europe-west4-drams3a": {
"numReplicas": 1
}
},
"restartPolicyType": "NEVER"
}
}i'm not sure if that is railpack directly? looks like its some railway specific configuration
4 months ago
You are correct
4 months ago
My bad on that one
4 months ago
Have you tried explicitly including at the steps? Only thing that comes to mind now
{
"$schema": "https://schema.railpack.com/",
"secrets": [
"BETTER_AUTH_SECRET",
"BETTER_AUTH_URL",
"CORS_ORIGIN",
"DATABASE_URL",
"DISCORD_CLIENT_ID",
"DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET",
"GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID",
"GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET",
"TWITCH_CLIENT_ID",
"TWITCH_CLIENT_SECRET"
],
"steps": {
"install": {
"inputs": [
{
"image": "oven/bun:latest"
},
{
"local": true,
"include": ["."]
}
],
"commands": ["bun install"]
},
"build": {
"inputs": [
{ "step": "install" },
{
"local": true,
"include": ["."]
}
],
"secrets": ["BETTER_AUTH_URL", "CORS_ORIGIN", "DATABASE_URL"],
"commands": ["bun run db:generate", "bun run --filter web build"]
},
"predeploy": {
"inputs": [
{ "step": "build" },
{
"local": true,
"include": ["."]
}
],
"commands": ["bun run db:migrate"]
}
},
"deploy": {
"startCommand": "bun run --filter web start",
"variables": {
"NODE_ENV": "production"
}
}
}like this?
4 months ago
Yes
4 months ago
Okay this looks better
4 months ago
At least its picking up stuff
4 months ago
I need to drop off for a bit, I'd suggest you use the config that works in the meanwhile so you don't get more frustrated - I'll give this a shot once I'm back, also someone with more experience in Railpack might jump in and help
4 months ago
<:salute:1137099685417451530>
4 months ago
any reason you need that custom railpack config in the first place?
I'm trying to deploy using railpack on dokploy but I wasn't able to get my railpack running at all
4 months ago
ah I see. in most cases I would say it is not recommend to use a custom config file if possible since it lose out on several optimizations that railpack makes. in your case it looks like you just want to have a custom build and start command. I'm not sure the configuration options in Dokploy, but can you set these variables
RAILPACK_BUILD_CMD=bun run db:generate && bun run --filter web build && bun run db:migrateRAILPACK_START_CMD=bun run --filter web start
And the other thing I used the config for is the limitation of wich Secrets are shared in the different steps, as Better Auth spams me with those annoying "Do not include XYZ_SECRET in the build process…" messages
4 months ago
I see. can you try something like
{
"$schema": "https://schema.railpack.com/",
"secrets": [
"BETTER_AUTH_SECRET",
"BETTER_AUTH_URL",
"CORS_ORIGIN",
"DATABASE_URL",
"DISCORD_CLIENT_ID",
"DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET",
"GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID",
"GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET",
"TWITCH_CLIENT_ID",
"TWITCH_CLIENT_SECRET"
],
"steps": {
"build": {
"secrets": ["BETTER_AUTH_URL", "CORS_ORIGIN", "DATABASE_URL"],
"commands": ["bun run db:generate", "bun run --filter web build"]
},
"predeploy": {
"inputs": [{ "step": "build" }],
"commands": ["bun run db:migrate"]
}
},
"deploy": {
"inputs": ["...", { "step": "predeploy", "include": ["."] }],
"startCommand": "bun run --filter web start",
"variables": {
"NODE_ENV": "production"
}
}
}the main changes
you don't need to include inputs unless you are changing them or they are non-default
you need to include the predeploy output in the final image
4 months ago
Did what was suggested work for you?
4 months ago
Is the underscore in the host a typo? _
4 months ago
Can’t have underscores in the host name
4 months ago
Look in the Private Networking section for the proper endpoint
4 months ago
Does it look like this in Settings -> Private Networking?
4 months ago
the private network is not available when building at the moment. you can instead do the migration at the start. Change the start command to bun run db:migrate && bun run --filter web start
okay, that seems to have worked on railway. but for some reason the migration fails on my dokploy instance.. <:confused:1031885128613511219>
Looks like there are some files missing. Any Idea why?
That's my current config:
{
"$schema": "https://schema.railpack.com/",
"secrets": [
"BETTER_AUTH_SECRET",
"BETTER_AUTH_URL",
"CORS_ORIGIN",
"DATABASE_URL",
"DISCORD_CLIENT_ID",
"DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET",
"GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID",
"GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET",
"TWITCH_CLIENT_ID",
"TWITCH_CLIENT_SECRET"
],
"steps": {
"build": {
"commands": [
"apt-get update && apt-get install -y tree && tree -I 'node_modules'",
"bun run --filter @esc-plus-app/db db:generate -- --schema=$(pwd)/packages/db/prisma/schema/schema.prisma",
"bun run --filter '*' build"
]
},
"predeploy": {
"secrets": ["DATABASE_URL"],
"inputs": [{ "step": "build" }],
"commands": ["bun run --filter @esc-plus-app/db db:migrate"]
}
},
"deploy": {
"inputs": ["...", { "step": "predeploy", "include": ["."] }],
"startCommand": "bun run --filter web start",
"variables": {
"NODE_ENV": "production"
}
}
}
why does this only copy the package.json and the prisma-dir? do I need to add a input to my first build step??
