Is there any way to fix this

Have you tried deploying in a different region?

ill try now

Discord voice handshakes from Railway are still failing with ConnectionClosed … code 4006

Still failing

Are you using discord.py?

no i am using pycord

do i need to use discord.py for railway?

No, was just curious.
https://github.com/Rapptz/discord.py/issues/10207
Other users faced similar issues as you reported.
Have you tried switching the region of the vc?

You can change voice chat region in channel settings > region override.

i did that and still not working

Ill try to switch to discord.py

Nvm cant switch to discord.py

bec i need pycord lib for my bot

needs receiving audio

still having the issue

any help on this from railway is it a discord issue?

bec on hetzner Vps i have no issues

Only on railway

whats the issue/logs?

.

are you using a self-bot?

or an actual discord bot?

whats the traceback? cause 4006 is discord invalidating the voice connection

not railway

1447317708818481173

Some tries it connected but 90% of time does not connect

it worked locally

your bot doesn’t have a processcommands method, which means the bot was created as a regular discord client instead of a commands bot. Every time a message arrives and your code runs bot.processcommands(message), Discord raises an AttributeError. If you aren’t using slash commands or commands at all, you shouldn’t call it on the client event (the process commands)

your logic for the voice connection is unstable, you don’t seem to check whether or not you are connected by voiceclient.isconnected() before doing anything with the audio, you’re proceeding anyway despite the connection failing

is_connected() returned False, but connect() succeeded. This is common on Railway due to network latency. Proceeding anyway… (is what appears from your logs)

overall from what I can tell, your logic is incorrect or flaky that it sometimes works and sometimes doesn’t

if you have a public git repo I can help you fix it, but if it’s private then I can only guide you on it

Thanks will try out to change the logic and see