a year ago
Hi, Im considering going for the Hobby or Pro plan for a express backend application I have. But I have doubts about what are going to be the pricing limits, its not clear to me how does it exactly works when it reads "pricing based on resources usage", for example, if I use the Hobby plan, is there a certain limit that its just not gonna go above or what can I do? Im scared of paying for the plan but receiving, idk, a charge of 500$ or something crazy because of "resource usage", do you know what I mean? Can anyone clarify me how it works? Also if it helps, I would at the very least need 8 GB of RAM and 1 CPU, if anything probably even more resources but that would be bare minimum to start with.
458 Replies
a year ago
for starters, will your application actually be using 8GB 24/7?
Btw a good thing to mention is that I dont need database, I already have that somewhere else (im using mongoDB atlas)
Well, not 24/7 but… maybe about, idk, lets say 12 hours of the 24 hours, since will be many people using, like on average, maybe half the time yeah, maybe even more.
a year ago
so then let's say an average of about 4GB ?
a year ago
then that's $60 before you factor in egress and seat costs
so the resource usage is calculated with this, and only this? no "hidden surprises" then?

a year ago
the only hidden surprise would be not understanding how pricing works I guess
a year ago
but yeah, that usage based pricing, and the seat cost for pro
About network usage, I expect each user will spend about 1 GB per day or so, and lets say I have like 500 users
a year ago
unlike a VPS, on Railway you only pay for the resources you actually use, so if your app uses 0.1 vcpu and 500mb of memory, 99% of the time, then you are going to pay significantly less than $60
a year ago
it's not about users, it's about how much YOUR app uses
a year ago
so you will be paying to talk to atlas
a year ago
in the form of egress
about network usage, what if some hacker basically spamms my app as much as possible, can I somehow set up a hard limit for network? so that I dont get charged crazy
a year ago
you can set a hard limit on spend, you can't set a hard limit on network usage though
yes I think mostly this will be, mongoDB atlas data fetching will be 90% of network activity, correct
a year ago
you don't pay for ingress, so there's no cost in getting data from atlas, but you will pay to send data to atlas
a year ago
use Cloudflare and setup some rules so no bad traffic makes it to your app
so basically i only get charged for "sending" data to DB, not fetching data from DB?
but they might request the DB data (already cached once per hour) like idk, 100 times per hour lets say idk, big ingress activity, that no extra charge you tell me, right?
a year ago
basically, in reality fetching data from the database still has a little egress since you are still sending outgoing traffic to the database to tell it what data you want, but for all intensive purposes you can ignore that cost since it's little
a year ago
correct, we do not charge for ingress
right, lets say I bring cached data from the DB, lets say its 500 mb of data. How much would it be approximately then, maybe like 1 MB of data egress there?
a year ago
far less than 1MB, if your call to the database uses 1MB you're doing something really wrong lol
oh okey, so normal request less than 1 MB, nice. Idk im asking cause im new to hosting providers heavy deployments in general
well heavy in my terms, my app is heavier than any other i done before int erms of data processing etc
a year ago
may I ask what tech stack?
a year ago
what does the backend do to make you think it will be using on average 4GB?
well, it takes 3 million auction house objects with like 20 fields each of the objects. then does multiple filtering and stuff like that
virtual economy stuff, cryptocurrency games, an API for getting prices, its very heavy tho yeah you see, huge amount of data
and each hour the data is cached so data processing wont be that crazy but still some custom filters will be applied and they will be fetching each hour like 500 MB of data to the frontend, thats assuming they dont reload the page, if they do a few times, then re-fetch the cached data, imagine.
something like that, what you think would be realistically good to go for?
a year ago
cache is definitely gonna reduce costs for sure
a year ago
I'd say under a $100 but that's not a promise
a year ago
but I will say your usecase is pro, not hobby
pro sounds powerful it has up to 32 GB of RAM, and 32 CPUs, that sounds epic but, im scared of the cost
a year ago
you can still set a $100 spend limit
I would rather limit the RAM to 12 or 16 GBs to make sure it doesnt get bruteforced by some guy spamming the page on 5 different devices or some sht xD
a year ago
you can do that too
a year ago
just know that your app will crash when it reaches the memory limit you set
a year ago
well a $500 bill would be impossible given you will set a spend limit
how much could an app cost with these settings: 16 GB of RAM, 4 CPUs, and if total goes over 100$ per month (whatever it is, either RAM, CPUs, network, etc.) just automatically close the server, like, crash it. will that even work?
not sure of the CPUs tho, how powerful are they? theres many typesof CPUs nowadays
a year ago
well over $200, but if your application is using that much then hopefully with that amount of traffic it equates to a good amount of revenue haha.
if you hit a spend limit your application will be shut down.
a year ago
they are xeon cpus
right 🙂 i mean long story short this works on % of users which makes sense
a year ago
I don't know off the top of my head, sorry
but do you have maybe some reference with like the year they got released or the Ghz they are using… i mean how fast/slow they are, some sort of reference
a year ago
I know they are Cascade Lake @2.8GHz
can I then if in the future I get more people, just click on pro and it changes plan instantly or is it complicated to change plans?
if I move on to pro I would still be limiting 100% to like, max 16 GB RAM and probably still 8 CPUs or something
a year ago
yeah you buy pro and then it will ask you what projects you want to put on the pro plan
and then it will re-launch my hobby plan project with pro instead and thats it?
a year ago
you will need to do the relaunch yourself but yes
a year ago
and youll need to set the spend limits up on your pro workspace again, since the personal hobby plan and pro plans are treated as separate workspaces under the same account
and btw out of curiosity, all this was me asking about backend but do you ever deploy here like, frontend apps, or nah?
cause im wondering about the cost of deploying the frontend. the frontend codebase isnt too big its kinda small, its mostly a big datatable with pagination that will fetch like, 500 MB of data and user can play around with the data, filter it locally, etc.
a year ago
oh yes we deploy frontends all the time on railway!
our docs site is frontend hosted on railway! -
a year ago
and we even have a guide for hosting a react frontend app on railway! -
a year ago
if you have cloudflare in front for cache yes
i mean frontend is chill is just showing DB data for the most part, a few register and login simple stuff also but thats it
a year ago
then you only pay for the tiny amount of cpu and mem, like 0.1 vcpu and 40mb of mem (if done right), and the egress it takes to send the web page, and page assets
okey so I think im decided: first thing I wanna do is deploy my backend from my github repository on the hobby plan, to start with that 🙂
a year ago
yes it would act as a limit, but i highly recommend you sign up for the usage based plan
a year ago
counter question, why do you think prepaid is better for that?
a year ago
i think ive mentioned several times in this thread that you can set a spend limit
a year ago
prepaid is not the way to go, its just headaches
a year ago
in the project settings
a year ago
is the repo name longer than 32 chars?
a year ago
then you will need to create an empty service and then add the repo
a year ago
click the + create button
a year ago
then you can add the repo in the service settings
a year ago
nixpacks will set a install command for you, you shouldnt use npm install
a year ago
pog
a year ago
go to the service settings and get one
a year ago
yep, but remember what i said, if your app ends up reaching those limits its just gonna crash loop
I usually run on port 3500 on localhost, not sureif here will cause trouble:

a year ago
as long as you point the domain to the correct port youre good
a year ago
okay now try on our metal hardware
a year ago
haha
cache might take similar time anyways but still, just to make sure it works with that too
a year ago
yeah thats why i wanted you to try on metal, the metal region has a better cpu than what you are currently running on
we will get there, but step by step, we go slow, i like to test cheapest then scale progressively, lets go slow.
a year ago
its the same price
a year ago
yeah of course
a year ago
you cant use volumes on it yet
a year ago
so it reads: "Volumes allow you to store persistent data for services on Railway", but I already have my mongoDB for cache, rigth?
a year ago
yeah but volumes are for file storage
a year ago
not applicable to you, but you asked so i answered
anyways about the better CPU we were talking, how can I get better CPU for same price sorry?
a year ago
switch to a region marked metal in your service settings
i change and redeploy, lets see, so metal always better, I always choose metal yes? 🙂
a year ago
it should be better, those machines use much newer CPUs
a year ago
i assume you have a start script in your package.json?
a year ago
magic
some AI im guessing that tries to figure out the command based on what it sees
a year ago
its just detected a server.js file and ran it
a year ago
we dont use ai
a year ago
i assume an in memory cache? if so, that cache is gone since you redeployed
like its not refetching all the data from some API as the first time, it just fetches from mongoDB, it still have to do some processing of the data so its normal it takes long time
a year ago
i would highly recommend you deploy redis on railway and use that as cache, since right now you will pay for the cache if its in atlas
a year ago
egress, remember
a year ago
time to learn then
not the time, its time to deploy this fast as possible and start testing, customer wants to start soon
can I see a chart of the hardware to see how much RAM / CPUs were used?
a year ago
look at the metrics tab
so, how bad is it? mmm, i mean 2 GB of RAM, thats quite good i think, not using that much
i think reason takes so much its mongoDB gridFS, i need to improve that myself
what if 10 people request at the same time, will server crash or just go slower a bit with all the requests?
btw this means like, 240mb of egress right? approximately? which is saving in further requests, right?

a year ago
yeah
a year ago
not doing cache in atlas will surely improve that
yes but for now i plan to continue doing cache in atlas, forget changing it
and 240 mb was without the cache, first time i removed cache intentionally
so further requests not doing much egress, which is like, good, right? saving costs yes?
just to make sure I undrstand whats happening, im a bit slow and new to this sorry 😄
a year ago
sounds about right
so lets analyse, this cache stays for 1 hour since the time its cached lets say
then obviously login, register etc would add a bit more but basically it would be this
a year ago
retrieving cache would be free, since thats ingress
still 17$ usd per month due to the 240 mb non-cached-yet call every hour
a year ago
id say so
so just to make sure this is clear, if 10 users use the endpoint at the same time, obviously its going to go much slower for a bit but it should in theory not crash the server, right? @Brody
a year ago
it definitely could crash, this is node after all, not typically known for high throughput with compute
a year ago
under high load you will want to use replicas, aka horizontal scaling
a year ago
so: "Scale horizontally by manually increasing the number of replicas for a service in the service settings. Increasing the number of replicas on a service will create multiple instances of the service deployment.", does this means I have to use different domains for each replica?
a year ago
read a little more and your question will be answered
so hows the cost of adding a replica @Brody ? just as if i was adding another exact same server in terms of pricing, or how it works?
a year ago
correct, its just another instance of your app
is it possible to do it so that i keep my github repo and he pays the servers?
a year ago
yeah you'd just need their card details and you would enter them when signing up for pro
i mean no way he gives me his card details, there has to be another way
a year ago
then you pay and send them invoices
a year ago
it needs to be done on the account you already have
but then how can he connect the github repo? can i keep the github repo on my github account and then give him like, permissions on his github account¿?
im assuming he creates an account for him, wont be using my railway account im just testing stuff with hobby plan but in future we deploy with his acc
a year ago
you can only connect one GitHub account to one Railway account
so theres no way on github to give access to somebody else like a github team project or something? idk im not expert at github either
a year ago
I'm not either
i guess i could create new github account for him and put my code on a repo for him and he can use that
a year ago
you would need to push code to that repo and be a part of their team, meaning that's 2 seat costs
a year ago
respectfully this is over complicating it, pay it and send them the invoice, that is how most people do it in your situation
a year ago
you definitely can
a year ago
I assume it's just that you don't want to set it up
a year ago
Is it hard for you to do that? where I live it's $70 and a sheet of paper
a year ago
fair enough
@Brody and anyways thank you for all the support today I will try ask you around here anytime I have more doubts
a year ago
lmfao thank you very much, very nice picture
😄 yes i love them, so fluffy and big, they friendly and rarely bite unless quite stressed
a year ago
have a nice day!
@Brody Hi again, I was investigating this Redis thing, I got as far as getting the code with code that should hopefully work, but this throws me an error of cant connect to client:

How do you usually install redis anyways and, is it complicated to do on railway?
a year ago
just click that same create menu, choose database and then choose redis
a year ago
and then have your code connect to it via environment variables
ah, and btw I found theres an installer for windows, its the first time I ever use this so no idea what im doing but hopefully works, I will try locally first then try railway
a year ago
kinda?
however, I have absolutely no idea on how to exactly set it up on railway
I see you wrote me before about "have your code connect to it with environment variables" but so far I didnt need any environment variable locally so im not sure where it would go
a year ago
Heya ! the redis client will use the defaults to connect to a redis server. If you're running a simple redis server locally, the server likely uses all the defaults, therefore it's kinda magic for you.
On railway, you would setup a redis service, then in your app's service, you would add a REDIS_URL env variable, and have it references ${{Redis.REDIS_URL}}
You're also likely going to need to edit your code to use your env: createClient() becomes createClient(process.env.REDIS_URL). to avoid null issues, you can also do const redisClient = process.env.REDIS_URL ? createClient(process.env.REDIS_URL) : createClient()
a year ago
You can learn more about reference variables here: https://docs.railway.app/guides/variables#reference-variables :)
a year ago
yes, Railway is a paid platform haha
Im asking because if its gonna cost money might as well use gridFS from mongoDB then
a year ago
yes, Railway is paid
a year ago
it all depends on the resource usage
then it should save money if anything, since Redis is supposed to save resource usage, right?
a year ago
no it doesn't cost much to have a idling redis database, and not having to leave the private network would be ideal.
the most ideal situation would be to use a railway hosted mongo database.
brother, you told me yesterday about "you should learn redis", now you are telling me i "better use a mongodb database" which is what I was already using in the first place? whats going on?
a year ago
you should do both, specifically both on railway, not atlas
Anyways, the other guy told me this: On railway, you would setup a redis service, then in your app's service, you would add a REDISURL env variable, and have it references ${{Redis.REDISURL}} in here
was he refering to process.env.REDISURL? whats that Redis.REDISURL syntax? idk
do you know about deploying the redis? im supposed to get some url but, no idea which one it is, is it this one here?
a year ago
i think nico explained it quite well
the main doubt I have is this: ${{Redis.REDIS_URL}}, what "Redis" here exactly, and where is that supposed to go exactly?
a year ago
per nico's explanation -
in your app's service
a year ago
nico said REDIS_URL
a year ago
maybe it would be beneficial to read his message again?
a year ago
let see your code changes?
i wonder if since its 2 different services, its considered egress when fetching from the redis?
a year ago
no you do not pay egress for redis since you are connecting to it via the private network
a year ago
hence why i also suggested mongo in railway
a year ago
no
Redis Client Error Error: connect ECONNREFUSED ::1:6379
at TCPConnectWrap.afterConnect [as oncomplete] (node:net:1555:16) {errno: -111,
code: 'ECONNREFUSED',
syscall: 'connect',
address: '::1',
port: 6379
}
a year ago
are you using ioredis?
a year ago
what is this createClient function?
a year ago
you have some syntax wrong and your code is trying to connect to a local database instead of the hosted database
a year ago
ah nico gave you the syntax for ioredis, this is the syntax for redis -

that example there on the url: is the REDIS_URL env variable reference, yes?
a year ago
yes
a year ago
awsome!
a year ago
now store cache in redis, not atlas
yeah, im using redis as of right now for cache, not gridFS like before for caches. as of now
a year ago
sweet
Im now thinking of deploying the frontend, completely different thing this time
a year ago
what kind of frontend?
@Brody by any chance do you know the exact command that needs to be used to start the production server on react with vite? Im not seeing it on the guide and locally I run usually "npm run dev" but thats not the one, I am doing "npm run build" but not sure how to actually run it
a year ago
the guide does cover that, its defined in the nixpacks.toml file and you should not be setting it yourself
hold on, before I continue, I do have a bought domain on NameCheap, is it possible to use that domain with Railway for the frontend?
a year ago
yes
a year ago
not sure if thats a breaking issue with the Caddyfile, also I try run the command right there on VSCode on another terminal, the "caddy fmt --overwrite" and it says its not recognised, idk
@Brody @Nico Hi, I have this issue, I already uploaded to Pro and when I do 1 request to my flipping tool endpoint to the frontend (and backend as well, both hosted here), it doesnt crash. But when I do 2 requests together, It wont work and it shows me this error on the frontend:

No way its crashing on 32 GB of RAM and 32 CPU right? my endpoint is heavy to load but not that much, when I try with 1 it usually shows about 2 GB of RAM per 1 call, 2 CPU per 1 call, so it should not crash with 2 requests at the same time
a year ago
node is single threaded so there is a limit to what you can do with a single instance, you may have fixed it now but you'll likely need to add some replicas at some point
@Brody And btw how does replicas work in terms of pricing, If I have 1 service with 1 added replica its gonna be max hardware cost of my plan (pro at the moment), so 32 GB and 32 CPUs multiplied by 2, 64 GB and 64 CPUs? how does that work exactly?
a year ago
you are only charged for the resources you actually use, and having replicas does not change that fact.
oh nice, so basically replicas just share resources of the same service, right? a service with the pro plan lets say, with 20 replicas, it can still never go above 32 GB of RAM and 32 CPU, yes?
a year ago
no, resources are per replica
@Brody Hi, by any chance is there anything faster than redis available on railway, that does the same thing?
a year ago
well first, why do you need a faster redis?
my backend not going as fast as I would like, is not bad, but, just wondering if there was anything. It still improved with redis vs mongoDB or mongoDB gridFS so not complaining but, yeah
a year ago
do you have actual metrics to prove that redis is the bottleneck?
oh no, not really, but since I moved to gridFS and redis and it improved, was hoping there was something even better
theres few bottlenecks but some of them are basically hard to dodge and dont think I can do much better, im a junior-mid fullstack guy anyways and this thing im doing is already quite complex, is 800 lines of code for an endpoint hit and except few console.logs I have everything is needed
a year ago
then im confident in saying that redis is not the bottleneck
you are confident but i cant show you my code and i cant figure out how to improve it much, thats why I asked, but yeah
I dont even know if theres a way to not have a bottleneck when I have to process literally 3,2 millions of objects with each object having like 30 fields, is crazy, this is the highest amount of data I ever had to manage
a year ago
write in a more performant language
thats a reasonable idea, but i dont know any other than nodejs tbh on a decent enough level
have you ever done node js before? if so, can you recommend me a similar and hopefully not too hard language to learn thats still performant¿?
a year ago
learning time!
a year ago
golang
yeah seems like, for now i will try to make this decent enough just so i can launch with the customer but, pretty much this seems like that
a year ago
it is, but you will not have a fun time going from javascript to rust, this isnt me gatekeeping anything, even experienced rust devs will tell you javascript to golang is a far easier path
@Brody Hi, is Redis stack available in Railway? I was doing some stuff and apparently for more advanced queries and similar stuff a Redis stack its needed, heres an example of what I mean: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76837500/unknown-command-ft-create-when-creating-an-index-for-redis
Hi!
Just pitching in as a community member. They do suuport custom dockerfiles and you can absolutely deploy your own redis stack (via github repository for example) image if there is no available template.
Out of the box, I think Railway will only offer core redis.
I would only recommend doing this if you have some previous experimentation experience with docker.
This example is a python flask app but the spirit carries over 🙂
https://docs.railway.app/guides/flask#use-a-dockerfile
a year ago
please do not tag the team


















