Keep getting "Oh No! Looks like something went wrong and the train derailed"

crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

I'm trying to deploy n8n with a template and I keep getting this error message (see first screenshot).

I've tried both of these templates as well (see second screenshot).

0 Replies

crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

n/a


7 months ago

This is because you have hit the maximum services you are allowed to deploy on the trial plan.

you will need to upgrade to hobby.


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

I had considered that…. But man, there should be a message that says that. Very frustrating and confusing.

Thanks for letting me know!


7 months ago

there definitely should be a better error message


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

@Brody - Does this also affect webhooks? The same setup works on the n8n free cloud trial, but won’t work on my Railway self-hosted free trial.


7 months ago

no that would be due to a missconfiguration on your part


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

Literally did the template, created a webhook trigger. And tried using it. Did it the same exact way in both accounts.


7 months ago

yes you have something misconfigured, you would want to read n8n's docs on how to properly setup a webhook trigger when self hosting


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

Hmm… saw one article on webhooks in the n8n docs. Will check again.

Anything specific I should be looking for?


7 months ago

nothing would be platform specific


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

Yeah, just checked again, and their “Common Issues” doc for webhooks. Nothing.

I’ll upgrade to Hobby and try again.


7 months ago

this isn't a plan limitation, we have no such controls over the software you deploy


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

Strange.

I used the template in my screenshot above, the one with almost 7,000 installs.

I created a workflow. Added a webhook trigger.

Copied the test webhook. Turned on the “listening”. And nothing comes in.

For context, I’ve used Zapier for 10 years and Make for 2-3 years.


7 months ago

as previously mentioned, you have something misconfigured


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

So the template itself has a misconfiguration. Got it.


7 months ago

not necessarily, it is not an efficient use of time pinning the blame on the template and or platform


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

I didn't "configure" anything though?

I installed the template, and went right to it.

I will delete the Project and try again.


7 months ago

not configuring something would indeed fall under a missconfiguration


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

Okay. So how to find out what to configure?


7 months ago

you would need to consult n8n's docs as we do not provide support for 3rd party software


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

Alrighty. I'll try.


7 months ago

webhooks work fine?

1289970859414651000


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

Turns out it was the template with 577 installs in my screenshot.

The one with almost 7k does indeed work immediately. Just tested.


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

The template "N8N (w/ webhook processors)" by Jack doesn't work out of the box.


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

So, to be clear:

The template "N8N (w/ workers)" works.

But the template "N8N (w/ webhook processors)" does not work out of the box.


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

And I don't know what's missing or needs to be configured.


7 months ago

may i ask why you would be installing a template with 577 installs instead of a template with just under 7k?


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

They're by the same person, and has more features.

Saw a few YouTube trainings by experienced users.

"N8N (w/ webhook processors)" was recommended.


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

Nothing other than that.

I expect to install the template and get going. That's why there are templates.

And I understand they are done by users. Not "blaming" anyone (this whole time).

Just trying to get things to work.


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

If anyone knows why "N8N (w/ webhook processors)" doesn't work out of the box, I would love to know. Don't know what needs to be configured, if anything.

But very happy to know that "N8N (w/ workers)" works. 🎉


7 months ago

"doesnt work" isnt super helpful


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

I can provide steps to reproduce again:

1.) Deplay template "N8N (w/ webhook processors)"

2.) Create a workflow.

3.) Add a Webhook trigger.

4.) Turn on listening for test webhook (set to POST).

5.) Test webhook.

This exact process works perfectly with the other template called "N8N (w/ workers)" (created by the same person).


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

That's all I know. Just trying to find out why it doesn't work.


7 months ago

not super helpful, what is the actual issue when you send the webhook


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

No data is received when I send webhook data.


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

It stays "Listening…"


7 months ago

what does the url return


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

Will try Postman.

I was using a platform to send the webhook data, but it doesn't give you response data.

But I've tested with the same method across 3 situations:

1.) Template "N8N (w/ workers)"… Works.

2.) n8n cloud (free trial)… Works.

3.) Template "N8N (w/ webhook processors)"… Does NOT work.

That's all I know at this point.

Will try Postman and get a response code.


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

404 Not Found


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

For the template "N8N (w/ workers)", I get this response:

200 OK

{
"message": "Workflow was started"
}

For the template "N8N (w/ webhook processors)", I get this:

404 NOT FOUND

Cannot POST /webhook-test/36129327-d279-4898-bf7a-3c76701588df


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

I'm using the exact same workflow setup across both and testing in the exact same way.


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

It works with the Production URL though.


7 months ago

thats something n8n should add to their docs then


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

I guess I'll stick with the "N8N (w/ workers)" template for now, instead of the "N8N (w/ webhook processors)" one.


crsmooreTRIAL

7 months ago

Thanks getting me towards a solution.