3 months ago
Getting this
Credentials could not be decrypted. The likely reason is that a different "encryptionKey" was used to encrypt the data.
this is a new issue in V2
any ideas on how to fix it?
7 Replies
3 months ago
@reech1 let me look into that 
When did you deploy the template?
And on which instance do you get that error?
Is it in the editor or in the log?
Status changed to Awaiting User Response Railway • 3 months ago
3 months ago
@ravitharume I fixed it. What I had to do was just to add a new credential and test it in the new instance, and then the rest of the credentials worked. Did you create the template?
Status changed to Awaiting Template Creator Response Railway • 3 months ago
Status changed to Awaiting User Response Railway • 3 months ago
Status changed to Solved ravitharuma • 3 months ago
ravitharuma
@reech1 glad it works.yes it is my template
3 months ago
thats awesome!!.. this is the most robust N8N template ive seen so far for v2.
I had to increse the payload size N8N_PAYLOAD_SIZE_MAX=134217728 also incresed the postgres standar serttings for more connections and ram
would you recommend scaling with duplicating services or with replicas? (worker, webhook, runner)??
also what settings you recommend for high volume executions ... were doing 20K/week and may increase .. lots of api calls and custom code.
Status changed to Awaiting Template Creator Response Railway • 3 months ago
reech1
thats awesome!!.. this is the most robust N8N template ive seen so far for v2.I had to increse the payload size N8N_PAYLOAD_SIZE_MAX=134217728 also incresed the postgres standar serttings for more connections and ramwould you recommend scaling with duplicating services or with replicas? (worker, webhook, runner)??also what settings you recommend for high volume executions ... were doing 20K/week and may increase .. lots of api calls and custom code.
3 months ago
@ravitharume ended up duplicating the workers and the runners instead of doing instances and only doing instances for the webhook.
reech1
thats awesome!!.. this is the most robust N8N template ive seen so far for v2.I had to increse the payload size N8N_PAYLOAD_SIZE_MAX=134217728 also incresed the postgres standar serttings for more connections and ramwould you recommend scaling with duplicating services or with replicas? (worker, webhook, runner)??also what settings you recommend for high volume executions ... were doing 20K/week and may increase .. lots of api calls and custom code.
a month ago
thank you for your compliments :)
You can just replicate the workers and runners
Everything else should be singular.
Does this high of a payload work?
Because I set it to 1024 (MiB), according to their docs 16 is the default value.
Status changed to Awaiting User Response Railway • 30 days ago
reech1
thats awesome!!.. this is the most robust N8N template ive seen so far for v2.I had to increse the payload size N8N_PAYLOAD_SIZE_MAX=134217728 also incresed the postgres standar serttings for more connections and ramwould you recommend scaling with duplicating services or with replicas? (worker, webhook, runner)??also what settings you recommend for high volume executions ... were doing 20K/week and may increase .. lots of api calls and custom code.
a month ago
I am curious which Postgres settings did you change/improve?
22 days ago
This thread has been marked as solved automatically due to a lack of recent activity. Please re-open this thread or create a new one if you require further assistance. Thank you!
Status changed to Solved Railway • 22 days ago